Thank you for the question.
On the first part, on the percentage of access on the first stimulus package the U.S. put in place in 2009, I guess in the assessment of that.... I know that it was largely discussed in the work of the committee at the time of the agreement. As you know, it's very difficult to get exact figures and data on contracts and what is accessible to companies and what contracts are won by Canadian companies and all of that.
You also have to keep in mind that in the agreement Canadian companies secured access to 37 states that are part of the WTO in the U.S. Previous to the agreement, that access was not available to Canadian companies, so that part of the agreement was important also. It secured procurement from 37 big states in the U.S.
What you're referring to is more the access to what was a temporary part of the agreement that is going to expire at the end of September. For the figures on that, I'll ask Kevin to comment. It's difficult to assess what was accessible.
I just want to mention that in exchange for the access to the programs, what was committed to on the Canadian side was procurement of construction contracts at the municipal level. Most of those contracts were already accessible to the U.S. They secured for two years the fact that municipalities wouldn't put in place restraints on the accessibility of U.S. suppliers to this.
On the second question, I'll ask Kevin to explain the $105 billion and add his comments, if he wants to, on the dispute over the proportion of the contracts that was accessible to Canadian companies.