I don't have a comment on location. I haven't studied it carefully enough.
It seems to me that everywhere I go, they are there, so I think coverage is strong. But it should not be static. As Canadian companies become more adventurous and successful, as they venture into other parts of, let's say, China, India, and southeast Asia, the government has to think about also expanding its presence into these new frontiers, if you will.
One of the big challenges for Canada is that we're latecomers when it comes to building markets in Asia. Being a latecomer means many of the good opportunities may be taken up already. It's very important that we always look for frontier markets and try to be at least on par, if not ahead, of the competition. There are many areas in southeast Asia, in particular, where we could try to be ahead of the game.
In terms of suggestions, I just want to throw one out for discussion. The trade commissioners probably are as close to industry as any branch of government. They have to be in order to be of service to industry. I think it would be of good value for the trade commissioner service to expand on interchanges with industry to, from time to time, embed trade commissioners into industry associations, maybe into companies for short stints, and then have them go back into the public service, so that they get a better understanding of the real challenges at the industry level. This kind of cross-fertilization could be very good both for the trade commissioners and for the private sector.