Thank you very much for this question. It's actually a very good question.
It's pretty simple. The NAFTA side agreement was considered a breakthrough at the time. It was a first-generation agreement. We're now in the third generation, if you wish. It's a very simple fact. About 70% of all complaints under the NAFTA side agreement were about freedom of association, collective bargaining, and fundamental rights. According to the agreement, those complaints cannot go beyond ministerial consultations, even if we wanted to.
Under these agreements here, not only can the enforcement of labour laws in regard to these fundamental rights go to dispute settlement, but we can also challenge the very content of the law in regard to those fundamental rights.
We are talking about scales of magnitude between what we had in this agreement and the NAALC that was negotiated 18 years ago. This agreement, which is a modern agreement, is streamlined and is much more efficient.