I am just going to follow up on the low-level presence issue.
Japan is quite reasonable when it comes to technical issues regarding GMO traits. They are good to work with, but it is always a risk that Canada may have an expired trait or a trait long since decommercialized. Those traits never seem to make it 100% out of the system. There are always some trace levels of GMO traits that can and do show up in shipments, and that's a commercial risk.
What we would look for in this agreement is to work closely with the Japanese to come up with a policy, both domestically for our country and theirs, for a science-based, commercially reasonable approach to the low-level presence of the expired traits that are still working their way out of the system, so that these do not impact trade.
In a lot of countries around the world, if there is a unapproved GMO event, their current level of tolerance is zero. With the testing technology out there, we are in a world now where you're always going to pick up some trace element of some obscure trait that could potentially block trade. What we'd be looking for is Japan's partnership in developing our domestic policies around how we treat low-level presence, and to try to get the rest of the world to adopt those kinds of policies.
For example, the EU would be a good place as well to try to get this, so we'd have some international standardization of this issue that is science-based and commercially reasonable, because it's becoming a bigger problem. We need to deal with it because it will start to disrupt trade more and more in the future.