That's right.
I apologize. I have to keep my remarks brief. Our time for speakers was reduced today.
There are issues on the building codes and standards side. Japan has a tendency to develop unique regulations and requirements when it comes to standards and requirements, and this makes it difficult for international exporters to comply with local standards and local building requirements. One example would be in the area of conformity assessment. Products used in construction, say, are assessed and deemed suitable for use. Japan typically doesn't recognize foreign certification systems or foreign certification organizations, and they usually require registration under their own system. That adds costs and complexity for foreign exporters.
Another example would be that they require expensive, and we would argue unnecessary, testing on some products, such as OSB, for emissions, such as formaldehyde. It's not that formaldehyde should not be restricted or regulated, but the information on what the emissions are from OSB is very well known. Yet they require monthly testing and monthly compliance, and it seems to be unnecessary.
We also think that Canada could argue for streamlining some of the processes Japan uses to evaluate and approve building code changes. It takes a long time if you're trying to introduce new systems and new concepts. Some form of streamlining process would be advantageous.