Basically, they all do the same thing. I think it's an economical motion.
The first motion would require the Minister of International Trade to appoint representatives to committees that supervise the implementation, functioning, etc., of the agreement.
The second amendment would require the Minister of the Environment to appoint representatives to the committee responsible for the implementation of the agreement on the environment.
The third amendment would require the Minister of Labour to appoint representatives to panels, committees, working groups, etc., referred to in the agreement to administer the labour side agreement.
Once again, it simply makes mandatory the carrying out of what the bill already provides as a discretion.