Again, I understand your point; I don't know if you're getting my point. It's true they have to give most-favoured-nation status, but it's the nonconforming measures that exist today that will continue to bind all those investments in the future. You can't assess the reciprocity of this deal in a vacuum. You can't ignore the fact that there are going to be continuing nonconforming measures in China.
Do you have a list of those nonconforming measures in China to share with this committee so that we can see exactly which ones will bind investment in the future?