The answer is yes. I didn't mention that in my comments, but we've been advocating for a flexible approach to how rules of origin requirements are determined. Some industries are more comfortable with a tariff shift approach, which is, by and large, the approach used in NAFTA. Some other industries, and you mentioned the agricultural sector, would be more agreeable to a substantial transformation definition. We've certainly told negotiators that it would be in Canada's best interest to have flexibility in how rules of origin requirements are determined for different classes of products.
On October 18th, 2011. See this statement in context.