Roy and I have had this discussion before.
I disagree with your analysis on Australia and New Zealand and supply management, but that's beside the point. There's no need to get into that here.
On the enforcement side, in our agreement with the United States, we're finding that the United States today has put in more marine regulations, which is going to affect our traffic in the St. Lawrence Seaway. The Canadian government seems to cave in to the Americans when they do these kinds of things rather than challenge them. On CETA, what do you see as the requirements to basically police the agreement and to do it quickly, so that if there are problems you're not put out of business before enforcement kicks in, and so you get the issue dealt with?