We are talking here about how quickly an agreement would be put in place and then followed thereafter. Unfortunately, in India it all depends, state to state.
In early 2000, Maharashtra state was considered to be the most aggressive state. Today it is one of the last ones, whereas Gujarat has taken over. Gujarat, I'm sure you must be aware, conducted a trade fair in mid-January, where close to 200 Canadian companies were present, and Canada played a major role, thanks to the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. They did a good job there of putting Canada in the front, or it could have been behind Japan, but again, it was a well-noted effort.
Today we are pushing that forward with an MOU, which is being put together by DFAIT through a committee of Canadian members so we can participate in the contracts that are required by Gujarat in developing Gujarat.
So that's the difference, and the difference is because the chief minister of Gujarat is an aggressive, forward-looking personality who has cut down quite a few barriers and given open licence to people to move forward to develop the state.
That is the difference we're talking about here in the CEPA, where again it is a federal government that has to push it forward in the interest of the country. Again, it all depends on who is driving it, who is looking at making it happen within the next few weeks, months, or I would even say years.