I think that's a very valid question. It is true that in the Latin American region for a number of decades many, many countries were marked with violent pasts, full-on conflict, military and others, and civilian dictatorships as well.
I don't know what timeline to put on this—I'd have to think more carefully—but over at least the last decade, if not more, those violent swings and that violent period in Latin America have really shifted. A number of countries have moved away from that past of dictatorship, away from that past of conflict, and made some very, very important progress on political stability, on returning to a peaceful environment, and on growing a significant middle class—which also has an impact, not just on economy prosperity, but also on their political stability. You've got a much freer press than there used to be and much more stable electoral processes in the Pacific Alliance countries. It's always dangerous as a foreign policy practitioner to estimate whether this will stick or not. But as a foreign policy practitioner, when I look at the four countries in the Pacific Alliance, I'm very, very confident that it will stick.
There are continuing human rights problems. There's the aftermath of conflict in some of these countries. This is normal: every country has human rights problems. But there have been some very, very important steps made by those governments to make sure that there's sustainable security and sustainable democracy, a really important shift.
So while it's a very valid question, the region, and particularly these four Pacific Alliance countries, has really come a long, long way.
I'll give you one example.