Okay. Thank you.
On the zero tolerance issues, you proposed basically finding some minimum standards for residues on products. I think the group presented a three-point solution. I don't recall all the points, but we'll certainly have them in the evidence.
One of the biggest issues the agriculture sector is facing now on trade is our production methods versus those of other countries. Where the level is zero tolerance, we can be out of the market in a minute and have a hell of lot of bad publicity, which doesn't do us any good.
I would suggest that's a proposal that goes well beyond the Pacific Alliance study. When we, as a committee, are doing our discussions on our report, we should perhaps consider writing a letter to the minister suggesting that those three points be considered in our discussions with all the countries that currently have zero tolerance. I see that as one of their major concerns. That's just a suggestion. I really appreciate receiving those three points.
To the pulse industry as well, if we join the Pacific Alliance, what do you see are the opportunities coming out of it, in terms of processing in Canada if possible? In some of the industries you don't process a lot of your products.
Do you see other opportunities within Canada, beyond the raw trade of products, where we can create some economy within Canada?