I'll answer the second question first in terms of the impact. If we extend the term of copyright, works that would otherwise be made available to the public, which could be used without permission in classrooms and in a range of different environments, would simply fall out of the public domain, in effect, if we extended that term of copyright, creating all sorts of restrictions. We've seen that in the United States, which did extend the term of copyright so that there are works today—Orwell is an example—that are in the public domain in Canada, but not in the public domain in the United States. They can be more freely and openly accessed in Canada because it is open in a way that it can't be in the United States. So there are real costs.
The U.S. has tried to incorporate this extension in the term of copyright in its bilateral trade agreements, but this is the first time that we're entering into these kinds of negotiations and facing that sort of pressure from the United States.