Yes. I'm sorry.
I'll just say that I think CETA has included provisions that make sure we have the right balance in making sure the public authorities maintain the right of regulating in the sectors you referred to from the press release, while as well protecting the legitimate interests of the investors to introduce mechanisms for being able to launch investor-to-state dispute settlement. Because that is our conviction, more straightforwardly: it's to protect investors' interests as to state-to-state dispute settlement, which is usually included in such an agreement. But the concerns are covered in CETA, and I'm sure the text, once it is published, will demonstrate that.
As for TTIP, the intention is to make sure that the public is rightly informed and all the stakeholders can express themselves, because there, obviously, the scale is broader. The concerns that have been expressed in Canada at a certain point as regards the investor-to-state dispute settlement in CETA are now being expressed on the European side as regards the U.S. agreement. So you see that it's the same topics that come up, and the same interests, and we feel comfortable that the agreements, both CETA and TTIP, are—