Perfect. That's lovely. You will find some interesting similarities with what I'd like to say.
Unfortunately, I did prepare notes, so I will have to stick with them probably.
As mentioned, my name is Sven Freybe. I'm the CEO of Freybe Gourmet Foods. I'm the third generation in Canada, and the sixth overall within our family to be involved in the business. Similar to what Debra just stated, we had to make one of those decisions, as she put it, in this past year. We decided to sell our family business as opposed to trying to continue it, so I can offer some interesting perspectives behind that as well.
We manufacture products like air-dried salamis, pâtés, sausages. Pretty much everything we do has its roots in products coming from Europe, specifically Germany. Some of what we make remains very traditional. Other things are tweaked to fit the North American palate.
I am very thankful for the opportunity to come to speak to you today. Similar to what was mentioned, what I'm very passionate about is innovation within this country and why, in my opinion, CETA provides for excellent value and is a great step forward for our industry and country. It really should be the catalyst for us to be able to accelerate future trade deals.
I'm sure you are all quite well versed in statistics. I won't take too long on it, but Canada's meat-processing industry has an annual revenue of about $24 billion, $4.4 billion of which is for export. We're the largest manufacturing component in the country's food processing sector. In B.C., the food manufacturing sector, which is made up of small to larger businesses, is now the province's largest manufacturing sector with over $7.6 million in revenue.
As I mentioned, there are three areas in which CETA is of significant benefit to us. The first is around industry support. The second is the responsibility we have to consumers. Third is based on the growth opportunities that it provides. I'll just mention some of the numbers.
The reality is that ours is an industry of very high risk versus low reward, one that faces quite a disproportionate set of challenges, from food safety areas such as listeria and E. coli, animal health, mad cow, and now the PED virus, which has just come into Canada, to severe cost fluctuations with respect to fuel, grain, transport, land costs, as well as quite fixed perceptions, for example, around the safety of the meat itself. A CDC study put forward that twice as many instances of outbreaks of food-borne illnesses were to be attributed to lettuce in salads as opposed to meat products, yet the stigma within the marketplace is that meat is the dangerous product.
Trade agreements provide us with the necessary industry support to open up lucrative new markets, to increase the returns that we as manufacturers or as industry have, and to allow us to reinvest that within our marketplaces.
CETA is one of these agreements. The EU is the world's largest import market for agricultural and food commodities. According to the Canadian Meat Council, of which I was a board member for the last two years, CETA represents a potential export increase of over $1 billion in revenue, compared to an average over the past three years of $54 million. The significance of this magnitude of increase to our industry cannot be overstated because it really does allow for some stability within the otherwise rough waters, and it allows us to put forward reinvestment.
To contrast this with some of the delay in concluding the South Korean free trade agreement, since the signing of the U.S.-South Korea free trade agreement, Canadian agriculture and food exports to this market have decreased from $1.1 billion in 2011 by almost $800 million, or 72% in the past two years.
Our industry does require support. The fact that with CETA we have a signed agreement before the Americans do is a huge opportunity for us to get a larger footprint in the EU marketplace.
In our industry—I'm talking from a five years' perspective—the benefit of CETA is primarily for fresh meat producers and limited to producers such as ourselves. In fact, it will serve to increase the competition in our segment. My perspective on it, to be clear, is that as long as access is fair and balanced, where we're not giving up market rights to receive little in return, and likewise for subsidies—don't muddy the water—this is a very good thing as it allows for increased choice and selection as well as better pricing to Canadian consumers.
This leads me to the responsibility that I believe we have to our consumers. It is my responsibility to build and run a successful business that has a strong reputation built on great products, which differentiate from others and provide excellent value, in order to initiate repeat business. If any other company, whether from Canada or Europe or elsewhere, is able to do that better than me, they should. It is really the consumer who wins in that circumstance.
This forces me and our business to look deeper into our vision and to understand to reinvest in ways that allow for our growth and for our continued success.
We as a country often discuss the productivity gap. In my opinion, in order to become better, to become more efficient, we cannot be afraid of competition. I believe that we must embrace it. We have to learn from it, and we have to change as required.
As an example from outside of our industry, and Debra touched upon this briefly, CETA allows for more dairy product into our country. This is obviously my opinion, but actions that weaken our supply management system are in some ways a very significant positive step as they allow for greater competition and choice, and ultimately the consumer benefits. I'll touch upon that in a few minutes.
However, CETA really can build the Freybe business in two key ways. It's based on innovation and partnerships. To provide some perspective, Aldi, a chain that started in Germany and which I have quite a bit of respect for from a strategic perspective, is the third largest grocery chain in Germany. They have over 4,100 domestic stores all based in a marketplace that's less than half the size of British Columbia. European manufacturing systems are set up to supply this huge and demanding marketplace. It's something that they've achieved over the last 10 to 20 years, as these stores have taken over the market that's there. In order to feed that beast, they require extreme automation, streamlining, and consolidation.
The Canadian marketplace, which really is small in comparison, is not attractive enough to them in order to create unique innovative products for our marketplace. They're not able to customize for us what we can customize for our marketplace. As a domestic producer, this is where we're always in the best position in order to innovate and design products that meet our needs better than what they're able to provide.
To be clear, Europe is not a target market for Freybe. It makes very little sense for us to manufacture German products in Canada just to send them back to Germany. Germany has the lowest food basket costs within the EU and it's extremely competitive. However, my focus and responsibility is to develop great innovation processes that allow me to borrow ideas from Europe and make them a better fit for North America.
We are, however, in a great position to utilize CETA to create partnerships. That's the part that excites me quite a bit. While I mentioned our market is generally too fragmented for them to allow for these small and unique items, it's perfect for them to sell a focused portfolio of products, products that they are great at and able to manufacture in large volumes and are unique to this marketplace perhaps. In the past six months we've begun relationships with at least two companies within the German marketplace to really understand how we can work together, either by having them manufacture products for us within Germany and we sell them here, or we just sell products here on their behalf. The value for them is that we provide the knowledge and the expertise on the ground here, and we provide for them the gateway to the U.S. marketplace. This becomes a win-win for both of us in that these partnerships allow us to provide a greater choice to the marketplace, but it allows us to grow, and that's quite critical.
Ultimately Canada is a nation of exporters. It's in our DNA. In order to secure our future growth, it's my opinion that we have to do all we can to cut down any barriers that prevent competition and innovation.
CETA for me is a big win and now that the delicate task of years of details is under way, we need to solidly set our sights on what is probably the next big deal for us, especially in this marketplace, which is the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The U.S.A. is already quite a bit ahead of us in this venture in developing the framework and the conditions for the TPP. I believe that Canada must be a very vocal contributor, not afraid to stand its ground. We must be a very vocal contributor. We appreciate and require the continued support, as with CETA, from the Canadian negotiators that were able to ensure a commercially viable program moving forward.
As businesses, we're not allowed to stand still. We require a trade mandate that grows with us, that opens doors and provides us with growth opportunities.
Briefly, I have a few words of caution. As mentioned, trade negotiations have to be balanced and fair and cannot allow for any one-sided access into a marketplace. There are numerous examples within the meat industry, and I'm assuming within the food industry, of differences in such things as food labelling laws, naming regulations, as well as food safety limits and regulations in place. These details are very critical, as what may appear to many people to be a minor difference could in fact be quite a significant cost and therefore a market benefit.
One example comes from labelling. Dual-language labelling is obviously mandatory in Canada for both products manufactured here and those imported into the marketplace. However, the reality is that this is not enforced in the market as can be seen in the case of numerous U.S. products that utilize English words only that potentially have phrases such as “all natural”, which we may or may not be prevented from using.
The point is that the cost of producing and maintaining a dual-language labelling system is significant and real. So in an industry such as ours with tight margins, those who don't have this requirement have a price advantage over us. I have one last “ask”, which is that I strongly urge the government to be cautious with respect to trademarks and geographical indications. There's no reciprocity in CETA as it relates to generic and trademark GIs.
I want to ensure that European-origin products cannot be marked as superior to Canadian products simply due to their origin. Freybe has won over 600 medals, more than 425 of them gold, over the last 40 years in sausage-making competitions in Germany. So these are the Olympics of the sausage-making world. That shows that what we manufacture is on par with the best of the best in Europe. We've been using names such as “Black Forest ham” and “ Thuringia bratwurst”, which is where we come from in Germany, for years. We believe it would be wrong to make Canadian consumers feel that just because something is coming from a German region as opposed to a Canadian one that it is superior.
Thank you very much for your time.