I'd be able to answer that question if I had a better look at it, but from what we think we understand, we're concerned about some of the risks associated with what we think are potential possibilities for legal costs associated with the response to challenges from local decisions that we might make in preferring one company over another. We think there will be more administrative costs in trying to sort out the higher degree of expectation and the perhaps more rigorous rules and regulations around procurement strategy.
We're concerned at some level around how we will begin to integrate this type of detail in rules and regulations with what I think is probably a greater degree of detail and expectation of record-keeping, of definitions, of defensive decision-making—the type of paperwork that I guess we don't currently need to do because we have more local autonomy.
All of this comes back to really a lack of clarity on what those expectations will be. What are the thresholds—not around the financial thresholds, but around the thresholds for the type of management costs, and legal costs, and responsive costs that we might be facing?