I think there are two elements to it, as I've said. One is eliminating the tariffs. Get that irritant off the table. That's nice. That goes to competitiveness right off the bat. The second thing is the non-tariff trade barriers or market access stuff. That's where we spend, as I said, far more of our time—not so much on the tariff schedules themselves, although they're problematic, but on phytosanitary issues, on lumber property issues, and on code issues and those kinds of things. Those are the ways you can try to inhibit our ability to have our products used in a country. If our products can't be used in the country, then we can't sell them there.
CETA provides a framework to deal with those non-tariff trade barriers. So when we look forward to the Japan agreement, the TPP agreement, those are the kinds of things we're looking for: transparency in the non-tariff world—so that people can't erect market-access barriers—and transparency in the tariff world.