On the direct threat of lawsuits, well, in my understanding the municipalities and the provinces, under the language that we've seen, won't be subject to direct lawsuits. It's the Government of Canada. This is similar to NAFTA. It's the fact that the municipalities and the provinces would be beholden to those regulations, and the first time municipalities themselves would be beholden to the agreement.
We see that there's a growing trend in companies using this tactic to reverse decisions made at the government level but also in the courts. I listed some of those in my brief. In 2010, there was a report by the UN saying that the number of ISDS, investor-state dispute settlement, lawsuits or disputes was 357 and that of these, 60% were in only the past five years. So we see a disturbing trend in the increased use of these provisions to try to undermine regulations and losses in courts.