Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you very much, Ms. Hillman. I think it was very informative. I appreciate the flow of questions from all sides in here.
I started out talking about that email campaign, saying there's no justification for negotiating as part of the TPP. I certainly think you've shown clearly why there's such a justification.
Your comments on transparency, and in fact some of the unique stakeholder engagement that's almost cutting edge with the TPP, sort of dispel the myth of this secretive cabal that the email campaign... I do note to my friends three of the four Canadian MPs on this MPs for TPP transparency campaign are Ms. Liu, Mr. Morin, and Mr. Davies. I hope they've taken this session and your responses to show that there's quite a degree of transparency and the appropriate balance of confidentiality, and why that exists.
My final question relates to the stakeholder engagement you talked about. You mentioned 79 submissions on the TPP from the outset through DFATD. Fifteen stakeholders attended the Singapore round, which I found very informative. The unique ability for them to talk to other negotiators from other countries, so actually really profound engagement of stakeholders....
Can you talk about some of the civil society organizations? I'm assuming there were some in the 79 written submissions. Have any labour or civil society organizations attended any of the rounds in your experience?