Absolutely, and in two ways.
One, trade agreements set the rules and they enforce them, so we want to set rules that set the conditions under which our businesses can operate effectively and predictably. We want to set predictable open marketplaces, and we will offer a predictable open marketplace in return, right? That's the bargain we strike. Then the agreement has mechanisms to enforce those commitments we've made. That's the benefit of having it.
The challenge of not having it is, first, if you don't have it, those rules and the enforcement are not in place, but second, others may have it, so there's a competitive disadvantage. If we're not at the table but others are, or if we're not pursuing these opportunities but others are—and I can assure you that in the high-growth Asian markets everybody is interested—then we are at a further disadvantage, because not only do we not have the rules, but those who have them are taking advantage of benefits that we can't offer our businesses.