The direct answer is, yes. I think it would help the public in general understand—those who don't follow trade by day and night—if those were all packaged in such a way that everybody understood. If it was clear to the broader public that education, intellectual property, infrastructure, skills development, and retraining of labour are all part of a successful international trade strategy, then it would help them understand what was going on and why it was going on, and I would suggest, it would improve the legitimacy of the whole operation.
At the moment I think, probably, trade negotiations seem a little remote from most people. Whereas, in fact, I would argue it's the basis of everything we do in this country. It's important for prosperity and human progress.
I think I'm answering in a long way to say “yes”. It is all part of the big package here, and that's what I'd like to see the next version of this encompass. Just in terms of the present document, I would suggest that the trade commissioners think of themselves as investment prospectors, in effect. They're not only linking up with what's going on now in country X and country Y, but a lot of trade also involves looking for new ideas, looking for new marketing, looking for new ways of doing things. They're already trade and investment and innovation counsellors, if we can call them that.