We've certainly learned a large number of lessons from our NAFTA experiences over the years, both with respect to the government-to-government type of dispute settlement mechanism, which was the case in many of the softwood lumber disputes, and with the investor-state dispute settlement approach, which comes to investment issues. We've applied those lessons and have made a significant number of changes to dispute settlement under CETA.
When it comes to government-to-government disputes, this will be by far the most efficient and innovative process of any of our free trade agreements and, I would argue, of any other free trade agreements. Another feature will be that we will have a voluntary mediation option, which is quite thorough and spelled out, to avoid getting into that dispute in the first place. We will have a shorter process than in previous agreements so that these can be resolved quickly and those that are interested can move on.
We have some specialized rosters in certain places for specialized issues. Financial services is an example. The numerous changes that we've made, including a much more transparent approach to dispute settlement, make this significantly different from NAFTA in those respects.