I would say they're strictly complementary. I can't think of an example where an ATA collided, in terms of Canada's objectives, with a free trade agreement. Again, it's a supporting mechanism. When we look at the amount of cargo representing Canada's exports, for example, I think 30% of Canada's merchandise trade to non-NAFTA markets is through aircraft, so it plays an incredibly important role in terms of expanding our trade. But, no, they work in tandem. They're complementary.
On February 2nd, 2015. See this statement in context.