Different jurisdictions use different metrics.
We have landed on this one, in a sense, because it's the simplest one to do comparative analysis with. Generally, size by employee is actually one of the indicators for growth and job creation because that is one of the economic generators. At the end of the day, in a jurisdiction like ours where we don't have a set-aside system, for example, it becomes less important. We don't target programming specifically for small or particularly for medium, so we don't say that if you have a 101 employees you're no longer eligible.
It doesn't prejudice businesses in any way that this is how we measure them. We just find that it's the easiest way to do the comparative analysis that we need economically.