No. When we bargain a collective agreement, the deal is the deal. We don't come to a tentative agreement on some issues, ratify, and then go back to the bargaining table to tighten up the loose ends. The deal is the deal.
The idea of deadline bargaining, for the purpose of the discussion, is that there is a drop-dead date to deal with all of the issues. The collective bargaining, depending on the amount of issues to be bargained, will start well in advance to make sure there's adequate time to deal with all of the issues. But at the end of the day, when we ratify a deal, it is the complete deal. We make sure that our members understand what's in the deal—all of the elements of it. In essence we're having a discussion on an agreement where we haven't seen the final text, which begs the question, "What are we missing?"
What we are giving is a presentation based on what we understand is entailed in the agreement. It's difficult to make a concrete and a comprehensive statement on the CETA when we haven't seen the finished product.