Well, I'm a lawyer, and I know the difference between a binding agreement and an agreement to agree. I agree with you that it's good that we have these processes, but I just want to find out what CETA does and what remains to be discussed.
Have either of your institutions, any of your staff members, done a current economic evaluation of the costs and benefits of CETA? I'll preface that by saying the only document we have is something that was done in 2008. It was an economic modelling that preceded the current deal we now have in front us. It preceded the great recession. It preceded the problems in Europe. It preceded the issue of currencies.
What we're looking for is a current evaluation, using the bones and flesh of CETA, to determine whether or not the job and the GDP growth are accurate at this point. Do you know if you have any staff members who are doing that work?