I guess it's a matter of net positive in what regard? Part of what I've been trying to point to is that I don't think the economic case has been made, and that the detailed study we do have available has indicated the loss of 58,000 jobs.
We're familiar, for example, with environmental assessment processes on things like resource projects. They are much more extensive in terms of the assessment that is done of the economic and environmental impact of a single project than has been done with regard to the TPP. It seems to me incumbent on the Government of Canada to at least devote that level of attention, energy, and resources to studying an agreement that Nobel-Prize winning economists and independent researchers are indicating may be damaging for our economy.