That's a good question, and I want to state that we're not against trade. We understand how important it is.
I think what we would like to point out is that the ISDS has nothing to do with trade.
When I was the portfolio holder for the Canada-China FIPA, what we wanted to include in the body of the agreement was the acknowledgement of the aboriginal entitlement treaty rights. That did not exist in that agreement, nor does it exist in the TPP. We feel it's imperative that there is recognition of undisputed rights and title in that agreement so we can protect our original lands.
Does that answer your question?