Broadly, I can say, from what I have heard from negotiators from different countries and also just members of different countries who are raising concerns with us—and this is one of my biggest concerns about the intellectual property chapter—that it exists to extend a U.S. dominance in this industry. That is basically what every single country's negotiator told me when I spoke with him.
We don't have a lot of chips to bargain here. Unfortunately, in the economy of the future—in the intellectual property economy, in the innovation economy—we are stuck with whatever the U.S. tells us we are taking.
For example, the negotiator from Brunei told me, flat out, “You know what, I didn't find a non-disclosure agreement, and I don't care.” He said to me, “What does Brunei really have to bargain with here at the table? What do we really have to do? We don't even have the technology to implement some of the pieces of the Trans-Pacific Partnership's IP chapter, yet we are being forced to accept it.”
They are negotiating on a much more of a—