Well, it's simply in the sense that right now we're witnessing a pretty dramatic change in the film and television industry in terms of the platforms on which it is being viewed. We're moving now to a market where players like Netflix, for example, are increasingly dominant. That is problematic in one sense. We're certainly witnessing this in the NAFTA negotiations, where it was written in an era where these changes weren't even contemplated.
Part of the reason why we think that establishing a positive enforcement that grants the absolute right to protect culture is that—I can suggest and Garry can jump in on this—a positive commitment would then enable us to in essence future-proof things. I would say that the world we're watching now, where streaming is becoming increasingly a dominant way in which Canadians and people around the world are watching the cultural products that our members help make, isn't something that was foreseen earlier. The problem with a negative approach is that we can't future-proof it, so to speak.