Yes, I was trying to be diplomatic.
When there are high levels of unemployment and an employer's still not able to attract people to fill those jobs, then instead of looking for government to introduce programs that will allow them essentially to defy the economic laws of gravity, the employers should pay more. They should make the jobs more attractive. If there's a problem with public transit, they should get buses and vans to take people from population centres to the fish plants, or they should consider moving the fish plants closer to a population centre where they could find some workers.
I think it's an illegitimate use of government power to allow businesses to operate when their business model is flawed. In this case, I think the business model is flawed, if they're saying they can only operate when they can only pay people $10 an hour, or the business model is flawed if they set up in a jurisdiction where there is no natural pool of labour. Move the fish plant.