Yes, actually, I do fundamentally.
I know that this committee and members of Parliament have been provided with reassurances from people like the chief negotiator. In fact, the technical summary on negotiated outcomes, which was distributed through Global Affairs Canada, explicitly says that the concerns I've raised will not come to pass.
We've looked at this. This is not just the Federation of Labour saying this. We've reached out to trade and labour law experts for legal opinions. Those people have looked at the text, and they've turned to people who have expertise in trade law. I don't mean to offend anyone here, but they've come to the conclusion that those people who are providing reassurances that the labour mobility provisions will not open the floodgates for temporary foreign workers are simply wrong. I might go as far as to say that they're misleading people.
The technical summary, which I'm sure you've all read, explicitly ignores all of the adverse outcomes which we're convinced are written into the agreement. I would take those reassurances with a grain of salt.
I think the priority for people like the chief negotiator is to sign a trade agreement, and the implications of the agreement on the labour market are secondary. If they're considered at all, they're not given the same priority as trade issues and intellectual property issues, and certainly not given the sort of attention and priority that we think they should be given.