As we note in our brief, there have been advances made in this agreement in the area of technical barriers to trade—which are really product regulations and sanitary and phytosanitary measures, which are the same thing, but in the agriculture sector—which quite often have arisen for reasons that are a bit suspect. They're supposed to be based on science, or for the genuine protection of human, animal, or plant health. We think, in certain cases, countries have been tempted to put in place barriers that are more designed to shield their domestic market than meet these legitimate objectives.
We think this agreement moves in the direction not of taking away the right to regulate, but of making it more likely that the regulations that are put in place are designed to achieve their objectives and not inadvertently designed to be protectionist. That's a very important aspect of this undertaking.