It's roughly $8 an acre, and since the average farmer has about 1,000 to 1,200 acres, bang, in one day they would lose $8,000 to $10,000 to the marketplace. Now, let's take that $10,000, roughly, and put it into the community of Red Deer. Once you multiply it by the many farmers who farm around Red Deer, or in the province of Saskatchewan, or in the province of Alberta, you can see how quickly that impacts the economy.
Is that another justification as to why these types of agreements have to be looked at in terms of a whole sector's net benefit to Canada, because of the trickle-down effect? You can't buy that new Ford truck if you don't get that $10,000.
Is that a fair statement, a fair comment?