Sure. I think the application process is, if I may say so, fairly streamlined. For the drawback, it's a one-page application. For the duty relief program, it's two and a half pages long. That said, I think what the industry is getting at is that the complexity of the compliance challenge is to demonstrate that you can meet the conditions of the program.
I think what's important for the committee is that the law is very clear that these are regulatory regimes—a licensing regime, in the DRP's case—and what's paramount is that the imported product can demonstrably have been exported to be eligible for the relief. That implies certain things for the companies, which I think some may find challenging and others not, such as the ability to have the books and records to show where that product goes across the supply chain. Who are you selling it to? Did they export it? Did it go somewhere else after that? Inventory management, similarly....
We're quite flexible in terms of what we would accept. We do a site visit and determine that it seems reasonable, but at the end of the day, what's paramount is that the relief only goes to the company for the amount of the good that was imported and subsequently exported. It's relief for the purposes of importing to re-export. It is allowable to have the product enter the domestic marketplace, but you have to pay the duty on that. You have to be able to track where that imported product is ending up before it gets exported.