Right. Canada is a very integral part of the global supply chain when it comes to food products. Given the lack of a multilateral agreement under the WTO, countries that have the ability to trade are going to bilaterals and multilaterals like the TPP. To me, we're still focused on a bilateral with Japan as well, but that's sort of plan B. A multilateral agreement is far superior, because then you have the weight of the other 10 countries, with Japan or with the U.S., wherever there's a problem. The whole purpose of a TPP, in terms of sanitary and phytosanitary issues, is to agree on each other's science and then build from that. The idea is to have uniformity, but at the higher level. Whereas Canada has a fairly robust system, some of the smaller countries like Malaysia and Vietnam and even Brunei don't, so they're looking at our science to form a basis and move forward. Do you think we would have the ability to sit down with major agriculturally industrialized countries like Australia and the U.S. and start to harmonize our MRL process? The problem we see with Codex is that it's so far behind that it will never keep up, let alone catch up as we see that ball rolling.
Do you see a role for Canada to play in leading that within the TPP, to make sure that we do have some consensus? A lot of the products are the same country to country.