Absolutely. That is essentially why our concern comes into looking at increased competition on the construction side. We've always talked about offshoring employment. This is really onshoring employment. We have some legitimate concerns about the extent to which a global entity, a global construction organization, will invest in long-term training and development in a local market. They have no incentive to do so. They want to move from project to project, build the project, and move onto the next one. That leaves a huge gap in terms of investing in that training and development, and making sure we have a workforce to satisfy exactly those kinds of opportunities that may arise.
We have to protect those middle-class opportunities for hard-working Manitobans, and Canadians, quite frankly, because we draw on a national network to be able to build Canada. If those job are gone, then it would be a great irony to see Canada investing in an infrastructure program that leaves Canadians on the sidelines, while a temporary foreign workforce has easier access to our market. By the way, by corollary, we don't have similar access in a number of cases.