We've had a number of examples in Canada itself. It seems inconceivable that a contractor that's going to build a major infrastructure product in Canada will bring a workforce with them. We've already had a number of instances: the Sinopec incident in British Columbia, as well as the RAV line. Astaldi, in building a major hydroelectric project in Newfoundland, very strongly expressed an opinion that it would be easier for them to bring in a Spanish workforce rather than have to work for the Canadian system. It becomes an issue of familiarity.
Again, we talked about reciprocity, and we talked about fair transference. When it comes to labour, there's always a high incentive. With products, there's very little leverage. With human beings, for example, in the Sinopec case we heard a lot of anecdotal issues where, in the Canadian context, they were being paid local market rates. They were depositing that money back to bank accounts in a very different jurisdiction and that money was not actually making it into the hands of the people who were doing the work. That's problematic.
I think a presenter in the earlier panel talked about compliance. We have no enforceability, and we have no capacity to comply. We do here, but we cannot transfer those requirements to other jurisdictions. We have no leverage.