One of the concerns I had at the time was that a previous agreement actually had created an incentive to produce value-added goods and secondary products. That became a disincentive under the last agreement. There are certain products and certain species that are produced in B.C. that aren't really part of this trade dispute, so efforts could be made to find a way to create incentives to produce these higher-valued goods and support the smaller manufacturers and such.
It's not a primary part of what this agreement is about, which is really managing the export of construction-grade lumber to the U.S., but I think attention could be paid to that. That's why I think it's important to solicit the perspective of what that part of the sector thinks would make a good agreement.