I get it.
I was shocked by that statement, absolutely shocked, because the essence of the scientific process is replicability. If the two methodologies are different, the Chinese will have an out every single time.
What are you going to do if the Chinese use the excuse that their methodology shows that our canola is substandard, and then you say...? Then we get into a he said, she said thing.
Why haven't we pursued the notion that the testing systems have to be identical?
My questions are for the ministers.