With respect to trade deals, we need to have very strong language that commits the signatory parties to respect science and science-based results, proper testing protocols, etc., and in the event of dispute, we need to have a very quick mechanism to resolve these scientific issues, with the parties' being governed by the outcome of that result.
I think, though, we need to keep in mind that when we're pressing other countries to commit themselves to science-based decision-making and results, we have to play by those same rules as well. We can't say we support science and science-based decision-making and then weaken when we're faced with certain issues that appear on our domestic front—for example, our registration of pesticides, rules and regulations relating to application and use of pesticides, etc. We have to govern ourselves by science-based rationale versus other types of decision-making.