Thank you, for coming.
There's far too little time. You've just opened up so many questions. There's some confusion though. I don't know how to frame this question, but I don't have much time. I'm going to try to frame it as quickly as possible.
There are going to be winners and losers. We're going to be positioned, in some areas of our economy where we're strong, to expand. You've said that, in essence. I know that the United States has recognized that for years too. You're absolutely right; they've focused on those high-tech areas.
In regards to the pharmaceuticals, doesn't 12 years being reduced to seven years stand your argument on its head, Michael, as far as the Americans? Doesn't that give them a disadvantage? Wouldn't they want to see a longer period of time?