Thank you all for your presentations today.
There were some interesting threads I picked up in there, and some of the questions that Madame Lapointe asked I would have asked as well.
The basis of the Peterson Institute study you mentioned takes into account full employment. It's not something that exists in Canada, and we haven't seen that for a long time. There are other studies, but our criticism has been that the federal government does not have an economic impact study. We would like to have our own economic impact study to understand if there are benefits to this agreement.
Even the Peterson Institute, I believe, shows 0% growth by 2030. The Tufts University study show 58,000 jobs lost in Canada and 0.2% growth to our GDP. We need concrete numbers and information. Although we don't have a crystal ball, this is our best predictor for being able to understand the implications for Canadians.
I want to touch on the job losses, I want to talk about people, and I want to talk about precarious work.
I wonder if you can pick up on what you were saying in regard to the types of jobs we currently have in Canada. The labour mobility chapter, in contrast to what we hear about accepting only business persons, would allow everyone to come into the country. How would that impact us in Canada, and in Quebec particularly?