Yes, I believe there's a direct threat to independent parts suppliers, and there's some concern with that. Again, we talked already about the percentages from 62% moving down to 30%, with the 10% flexibility. However, I think the bigger concern is not only the 20,000 that we think are vulnerable—the one-fifth—but also that once you start taking those independent part suppliers and moving them to other places, like the southern states and Mexico, then an OEM will want just-in-time parts. It's not conducive for them to spend $2 billion, $3 billion, $4 billion in Windsor, Ontario, when most of their supply base moves to Mexico. It becomes a bigger hit to us in the long run. That is a double whammy, so to speak, because as you start to get some of these countries providing those lower cost items with government support directly to that industry, you have the OEMs who say that they want the plants as close as possible to them—Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Toyota, Honda. They will relocate because they have tax incentives, they have tax abatements, they have training costs, they have property right now in Goiana, Brazil. Chrysler got 90% of their overall investment for a full greenfield site by the government. It's just impossible to compete with that kind of money that's thrown at the industry, and when you have a greenfield site like that, this causes more investment from that corporation into that industry because they have major support. We need more of that, and TPP doesn't provide it.
On May 12th, 2016. See this statement in context.