I want to thank Professor Anderson for basically comparing what we have to compare, a world without Canada being at the table if the U.S. ratifies it. This is not an analysis between the status quo and the TPP, which I think is something that I think we all need to keep in mind here.
As far as the economic assessments and economic impact studies go, most of those assessments were based on comparing the status quo to a world in which 12 members would be in the TPP. I don't think that's worth as much as the analysis that needs to be done if the Americans and the Japanese are in the TPP, and Canada is not? That, I think, is the analysis that needs to be done.
I'm sure Mr. Marchand can agree that any economic analysis is only as good as the presumptions made within it. That needs to be done, and it hasn't been done yet. That's the comparison that needs to be made. So thank you for basing your analysis on the reality of the situation. I do appreciate that.
I have a question for Ms. Hasenfratz. Professor Anderson talked a little about how we'd have to have separate production lines as one of the options if we're not in the TPP and the Americans are. You know the industry probably better than anyone at this table. How viable is it for suppliers to run separate production lines?