In principle, reciprocity exists with some of the countries that we've signed on with in article 12.1(a), I think it is. One question I think we should ask is, why did the U.S. not participate in the discussions around labour mobility? There are probably a lot of reasons that come to mind.
I would say there are three reasons to believe that temporary entry of foreign workers under the labour mobility provisions will have a huge impact.
First, it opens up entry commitments to more major developed countries such as Australia and Japan. You can imagine Japan sending over their own engineers within the auto parts sector, and taking those jobs away from our engineers. We don't really have a history of sending these people overseas. We don't find that our engineers really want to go overseas. They like working in their home country and spending time with their families.
The second is that there is broader occupational coverage under professionals and technicians, which includes lower-skilled workers under the TPP. This will have huge impacts on carpenters, tradesmen, mechanics—