It's true we are working with the Europeans at this point to revise some of the investment provisions. There are really two parts to this.
The first part is that we're clarifying some of the provisions in the agreement with respect to the obligations to ensure that the government's right to regulate is not interfered with by investor claims that could affect that ability to regulate. Most of those provisions are going to be described as “provisions for greater certainty”, in other words, to make it very clear to any kind of arbitration process what we intended when we negotiated the agreement.
A second part of this relates to the process itself. You mentioned the investment court system. The EU has proposed that to the U.S. in the U.S.–EU negotiations. They've not proposed that system to us.
We are working on a system that would be somewhat different from what is in the CETA now, particularly with respect to the selection of arbitrators or members of a panel. We're also looking at whether we can advance the process toward having an appellate mechanism, which is currently mentioned in CETA as a future work program. We're looking at whether we could have that implemented when CETA comes into effect. Those are the issues we're working on with the Europeans right now.