On your first question, on the policy, Canada is a science and evidence-based jurisdiction. When it comes to prescribing information on labels, we're mainly trying to focus on what could constitute a health and safety hazard. You are absolutely right that there's an interest. As a consumer, I'm interested in knowing exactly, in having as much information as possible on labels. There are different ways of getting to that. There are voluntary standards or mandatory standards. In the case of spent fowl, it's very difficult to do that, although if you purchase a can of chicken noodle soup, for example, you'll often see that it refers to “mechanically divided”, and so on. That's recognized as being a reference to spent fowl.
To your previous question, where you were saying that from your perspective as a farmer it should be distinguishable, you're thinking of the bird, but it's important to know that in 2015, of the volume and the quantity of spent fowl that was imported, only 17% came in the form of a live bird. The bulk of it came in the form of breasts. You can distinguish; probably, if you see two birds, you may have a sense of what the difference is.