You have all these moving balls, and we get that, but then you also have some consistencies. If you look at some of the negotiations, some of the things that you did in previous negotiations would be brought into the existing negotiation, would they not?
Let me use an example: ISDS. ISDS is fairly controversial not only here, but in CETA. There are obviously benefits to Canadian companies having that there. If it weren't there, what would be the impact on our Canadian companies investing abroad if they didn't have that protection? Maybe you could give us some oversight into that, because that would be consistent from trade deal to trade deal. ISDS has been involved in many trade deals.
Can you give us some feedback there?