Yes, we see an opportunity in doing it, but we don't see much opportunity in selling it at way below the cost of production, which is a big problem with the so-called trade agreement. It's more about control rather than trade, and that's one of our big points about it. Because right now, as I mentioned earlier, the Europeans are producing milk and they're looking at trying to subsidize it incredibly, but the amount of dollars is just beyond...and I think they're backing away from it now. But the producers there have just gone in a downspin because of the signing and taking away supply management.
If they look at a marketing system like supply management that we have here, rather than trying to dismantle it, I think it's much better to trade on such a system as that.
When you mentioned Japan, we have been trading even before.... A good example of that was when we had a wheat board in western Canada. We traded quality wheat with Japan and others, and they were interested in getting it because of the service we provided, the quality we provided. Once you take away those types of marketing approaches, and bring down the quality of a product, and bring it way below the cost of production, I think we're in for a lot of problems, particularly for our future generation of farmers.